Analysis of Procter and Gamble Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Analysis of Procter and run a risk - Research Paper ExampleAdditionally, its strategy has been very effective worldwide that is exemplified by its 138,000 employees globally. And, at the selfsame(prenominal) cartridge holder, due to the worldwide demand for P&Gs services and products, its management is forced to bone such competitive strategy that ensures its sound global tradeing strategy with variation. However, it almost lost its market supremacy to competition in the mid 1980s had it not been its unsound and aggressive play-to-win strategy (Davila, Epstein, & Shelton, 2006, p.73). by and by that period, the management of the gild realized this fact and changed their competitive strategy. Rivals- stronger pecuniary position both in the irrelevant and domestic market have left many of its rivals behind. As mentioned earlier, the company was declargond as the twenty-fifth largest by revenue clearly provided its position in the U.S. market in comparison with its competitors such as Johnson & Johnson, Kimberly Clark, and Unilever. They are not only identified its main competitor in the U.S. market but in addition in the global market as well. However, the company has been successful in maintaining comparatively better financial position in the industry due to the fact that it has capability and ability to use the latest innovation in its products. And, besides, the P&G has very effective and efficient manufacturing processes that enable her to remain competitive in comparison with its rivals. New entrants- P&G operates in a diverse industry- ranging from consumer products to households. In the local as well as in the global market, the company uses innovation in its products in a behavior to ensure their consumers demands. As a result, the new entrants in the industry would face very punk rocker time to stay competitive as the company has very strong and stable market brand visit and perception. Buyers-the company sells a diverse range of buyers. They range from home products such as Ariel, Pantene, Head & Shoulders, lavation and cleaning products (detergents), beauty care (shampoos, cosmetics), paper goods (toilet papers), famine care (sanitary towels) food and beverages (snacks and coffee) and health care (medicine and toothpaste) (corporatewatch.org, web). The company products clearly highlight the diverse range of buyers that are being served globally by the company. Suppliers- P&G greatly values its suppliers and relationships with the suppliers. Recently, in that direction, the company has put into practice Combine Nets prelude to developing and building sourcing networks, called as expressive competition (Hughes, Jacobs, Begg, 2006). In this process, the P&Gs suppliers are greatly benefiting by this approach expressive competition match demand to the efficient means of end product and at the same time removes exposure risks in making offers. Aggregately, this is another evidence of the company in introducing innova tive means to interact with its suppliers. Threat of substitutes- P&G has been famous for its high quality products which are pretty difficult to match or beat (Masahudu Gunu, 2010). Consumers want high quality goods at low-cost and reasonable prices. It is this thought that has been the motto of P&G in its product development and innovation, making its products recognized worldwide. It would not easy for any new entrants to come up with new products, putting a tough time to P&G products. Additionally, the brand image of P&G is considerably stable globally.